When art involves conscious for decision-making and portrait reflects self-consciousness, then what exactly the message or meaning of portrait? Why do certain artists decide to create other people as an object as a visual archives of presence and somehow decidedly so in a particular time and space? The question declares itself; “Describing existence of one particular object”.
Portrait painting of someone we know and stranger are often having a common issue: it’s not about the familiarity (resemblance) of the subject and the vision into a painting. Most of party are stated portrait painting is about imitation from ‘mimesis’ which are from classic Geek philosophy, Plato. Hand-Georg Gadamer said ‘mimesis’ is widely known “has the sense of ‘making the absent present”. To actualized of ‘nothing’ into ‘something’. When there are many of interpretation of Portrait itself. To manifest idea into physical. Xie Dongming as the most well-known realism painter from China.
Through paintings Dongming not only noted as ‘existed’ but actualized the idea of life and culture of China. Dongming creates the portrait not fully realism but also expressionismat the same time. The power of the expression from the paintings also giving us the idea of identity through the technique and color material. He could brought us to get close to our feelings to whom see it, also summarized his or ourselves experiences of live interaction that contained intention of appreciation and value.
The result that he want to reach, not only for the value of ‘accuracy’ about certain situation or events but the accession of experiences of beauty. The portrait tells manifestation of reaching its own beauty, rather than fully speaking for the object instead.
Selfscape by Xie Dongming
15–24 February 2017 | 10.00 – 18.00 WIB
Gedung D Galeri Nasional Indonesia
We are living in the era of software, hardware, smartphone apps controlled the future. For technology digital media now shifting from passive customer to active customer. The differences of them two are how they consume the media; old days was the phase of receiving information, and today people are more active to creating information. People are easily create content, moving picture, photos, sounds, texts and so on.
The receiving eyes and ears are now directed to calculated machine (software / apps) which controlling its own users. The barrier between the power and control by machine itself are so thin and tend to be illusive.
In this exhibition, thirteen of Indonesian Artists facing this situation with production strategy method and visual not to against the limitation of this phenomenon. Otherwise, the artists were playing within the cracks.
Chosen method, system and texts they displayed with various shape of information that has been filtered to process of exchanging codes made by its artist, curator team, and also the visitor themselves.
The content of the exhibitions are displayed not just for showing the technology and method the artists used but to make an open dialogue to talk about the negotiate production and content between the artist and the visitors.
In my humble opinion, ‘Following’ exhibition has its own purposes of the nowadays digital-technology media: in this era which people are easily make a content and creating a new art by downloading it through apps and software are the opposite of what – ‘somewhat called as’ – ancient artists do. Just a bit of reminder, the media of displaying a content is not always about how easy and complex of the process but the true meaning of each pieces. How they can relate to the right audiences and their habits.
9– 21 Februari 2017. Pukul 10.00-19.00 WIB
(waktu istirahat pukul 14.00-15.00 WIB)
Gedung A, Galeri Nasional Indonesia
Adel Pasha. Adhari Donora. Adityo Pratomo. Andang Kelana. Ari Dina Krestiawan. Ari Satria Darma. Budi Prakosa. Gelar Agryano Soemantri. Gooodit. Mahesa Almeida. MG Pringgotono. oomleo. Ricky ‘Babay’ Janitra